http://www.teaching-learning.utas.edu.au/__data/assets/image/0005/27266/assessment.gif
a.
Understanding
the varieties of assessment
Assessment purposes
The purposes
of assessment are to provide feedback to students and to serve as a diagnostic
and monitoring tool for instruction. Assessment is not a thing that is done to
students but a process that can lead to improved learning. And then the result
of the assessment is shared with both the students and the teacher.
In this case
there are assessment and evaluation. Assessment is the act of collecting
information about individuals or groups in order to better understand.
Evaluation is a judgment (based on multiple sources of assessment information)
regarding the quality or worth of the assessment result.
In evaluation
is both formative and summative. Formative assessment sets targets for students
and provides feedback on progress toward those targets in ways that foster more
progress. In the classroom, teachers use formative assessment on a daily basis.
The
characteristics of formative assessment:
- It is part of
teaching and promotes learning in a positive intention.
- It is not
referenced by criteria and considers the progress efforts showed by each
individual as well as other aspects uncovered in the curriculum.
- It provides
diagnostic information on inconsistencies that would be taken into account
as “error” in summative assessment.
- It provides
validity and usefulness and proceeds over concerns for reliability.
- It accommodates
students to be central and active in their own learning and understands
their strengths and weaknesses, and how to deal with them (Harlen and
James; 1997).
Use summative
assessments as a culminating experience, which give information on students’
mastery of content, knowledge, or skills. Summative assessment would be scored
events that are placed in a teacher’s grade book. These grades are evaluated
into final grades for the end of a marking period, course of study, or mastery
of standards, and are reported for student achievement.
The
characteristics of summative assessment:
- It has to be
done when achievement is to be reported.
- It used public
criteria to relate the progression in learning.
- It may combine
results of different students for different purposes.
- It attempts to
avoid endangering validity by employing reliable methods.
- It allows the
use of quality assurance procedures.
- It
requires evidence of performance to meet the used criteria (Harlen and
James; 1997).
Assessment
Language
There are
formative, diagnostic, and summative. Over the years, numerous other terms,
such as traditional, non-traditional,
alternative, authentic, performance, and sound assessment.
Selected
versus constructed response
Both
classroom and large-scale assessment have traditionally relied heavily on this
assessment type. Such as selected-response assessments include the standard
true-false quiz and the multiple-choice test so familiar to students.
Assessments seeking selected responses have a place, especially in assessing
certain types of understanding, but not to be the only measure of student
achievement of learning targets. In contrast, assessment may also be designed;
students must create or constructs, a response to a question or prompt. Assessment
requiring a constructed response includes stock classroom assessment such as
short-answer and essay question (to respond to a question by using their own
ideas and their own words).
Performance
and product assessment methods
Performances
are musical recitals and dramas, for instance. Products are essay and posters.
Both of these assessment methods require that students obtain mastery of
learning targets outlined in the curriculum. Products are student creations and
performances that show what students can do.
Both assessments must align to the learning targets. An understanding of
the influence performance assessment has on the learning process requires a
broader view of this type of assessment.
Classroom
activities and these assessment methods have one differentiation. That is the
harder concepts to convey to teachers-perhaps because teachers may enjoy doing
a particular activity with their students and believe the lesson has merit
simply because it is so enjoyable.
Authentic
Assessment
Some assessments elicit demonstrations of
knowledge and skills in ways that prepare students for life, not just take
test. An authentic assessment usually includes a task for students to perform
and a rubric by which their performance on the task will be evaluated.
Authentic assessment refers to assessment tasks that resemble reading and writing
in the real world and in school.
Quality assessment
When teachers are clear in their expectations
for students regarding an assessment, consider bias and purposes of the
assessment, and share those expectation in advance of the assessment, they are
practicing quality assessment. Quality assessment also necessitates providing
good feedback to students, using assessment data to improve instruction, and
using a variety of assessment methods. Quality classroom assessment is to view
assessment as an ongoing, student-participatory activity, nor just as something
the teacher does to students.
Test
Test is using a method or instrument to
measure skills, knowledge, performance, capacities, intelligence, or aptitude
of an individual or group. One piece of classroom assessment information is
generally test. Constructed by test is to meet a specific need or purpose, such
as individual diagnosis, summative assessment of individual achievement, or
school accountability for teaching a curriculum.
Standardized and high-stakes test
Standardized test can include multiple choice
test, oral examinations, essay writing, and performance-based assessments. In
general use, the term standardized test usually refers to a multiple-choice
type of exam. Standardized tests are high stakes when the results are used to
mandate actions that affect stakeholders in education or simply when the public
perceives the test to be of high importance.
Conventional classroom tests
This is typical tests used or created by
teacher. Many ready-made tests can also be found online or in textbook
resources. Problem with alignment to instructional learning targets may arise,
however, if such ready-made tests are used.
Norm-referenced versus
criterion-referenced tests
Norm-referenced assessment compares student
performance to the performance of a normal group of students, either national
or local.
Criterion-referenced assessment tells the
teacher how well students are performing in terms of specific goals or
standards.
Relevance, reliability, and
validity
Relevant are
closely tied to classroom instruction. Reliable is show consistency of scores
across evaluators, over time, or across different versions of a test. Valid is
measure that they are intended to measure, rather than extraneous features.
b.
The Role of
Assessment in Supporting Teaching and learning
a.
assessment
Assessment is collecting and interpreting all
information about students, covering everything from informal classroom
observations to achievement tests. Assessment helps the teacher make judgments
and decisions to improve student and classroom learning.
In the assessment there are element of
classroom assessment (by McMillan, 2007, there are purpose, measurement,
evaluation and use are four essential elements in the implementation of
classroom assessment as illustrated in the following figure) and domains of
classroom assessment (there are cognitive, affective, psychomotor).
b.
Models of Instruction and
Assessment – Assessment in the Context of Instruction
The classroom assessments include: after instruction for checking
student progress and helping make decisions for the next instructions and before instruction for making
influences to the nature of instruction and during instruction for providing feedback and getting students
stayed on task. There are two figures of models instruction and assessment.
Those are conventional models and standards-based model.
c.
Assessment Purposes and
Processes
From Airasian,
2008:
Assessment
Purposes
Assessment
Tools
Assessment
Processes
Planning
for Instruction
Quizzes,
essays, o bservational checklists
Free
writes, think aloud, concept maps
Pre-assessment
of students’ status related to knowledge and skills to be taught in an
instructional unit
Adjusting
Instruction
Homework,
assignments, quizzes, journals, lab notebooks
Worksheets,
drafts of written work, observational checklist, anecdotal records
Ongoing
formative assessment of students’ work to see whether instruction is
successful and, if not, where students still need work
Diagnosis
Homework
assignments, read aloud, individually administered math problems, worksheets
Observational
checklists, anecdotal records, interviews
Close
examination of the work of students to specifically diagnose individual
students’ strengths and weaknesses
Expertise
Evaluating
Research
papers, unit or course tests, literacy essays, short stories/poetry
Formal
presentations, formal debates, demonstrations, reports of scientific
investigations
Determine
level of expertise and assign scores and/or course grade.
Determine
whether students will graduate or be promoted.
Comparison
Norm
referenced tests, screening tests
Admission
tests, contests
Rank
or sort students based on scores.
Use
scores based to select students for programs/schools
d.
Effects of Classroom-Based
Assessments on Students
Student learning motivations and goals are
impacted by classroom-based assessment.
Teachers provide informative, meaningful feedback for students to define
their goals of learning towards enhancing their self factors in learning, which
are considered as the determinants of motivation.
e.
Influencing
Motivation through Instruction and Assessment
There are ego involvement (refers to
situations accommodating ego factors such as social prestige), extrinsic
motivation (behaviorists link the performance of a behavior to the nature of
the behavior itself) and task involvement (necessary for a teacher to provide a
wide range of in-class student assignments to obtain multiple perspective of
feedback from students) that influencing by
motivation through Instruction and Assessment.
Assessment
Purposes
Assessment
Tools
Assessment
Processes
Planning
for Instruction
Quizzes,
essays, o bservational checklists
Free
writes, think aloud, concept maps
Pre-assessment
of students’ status related to knowledge and skills to be taught in an
instructional unit
Adjusting
Instruction
Homework,
assignments, quizzes, journals, lab notebooks
Worksheets,
drafts of written work, observational checklist, anecdotal records
Ongoing
formative assessment of students’ work to see whether instruction is
successful and, if not, where students still need work
Diagnosis
Homework
assignments, read aloud, individually administered math problems, worksheets
Observational
checklists, anecdotal records, interviews
Close
examination of the work of students to specifically diagnose individual
students’ strengths and weaknesses
Expertise
Evaluating
Research
papers, unit or course tests, literacy essays, short stories/poetry
Formal
presentations, formal debates, demonstrations, reports of scientific
investigations
Determine
level of expertise and assign scores and/or course grade.
Determine
whether students will graduate or be promoted.
Comparison
Norm
referenced tests, screening tests
Admission
tests, contests
Rank
or sort students based on scores.
Use
scores based to select students for programs/schools
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar